EDEB8 - Ultimate Online Debating
About Us   Debate    Judge   Forum
Views:
1584

Government should ban the sponsorship of religious pilgrimages

(PRO)
0 points
(CON)
WINNER!
10 points


View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment
nzlockienzlockie
Oh goody, I'm pleased this ones going ahead. Good luck both sides!
Posted 2014-02-12 11:32:50
nzlockienzlockie
Haha - I know, I wanted to as well but I'm travelling at the moment and internet is not reliable.
Posted 2014-02-12 00:59:28
adminadmin
Y'know, I actually want to accept this one. I'll wait for a bit because I'm busy with other debates.
Posted 2014-02-11 22:59:37
nzlockienzlockie
Hey judex, there's an option you can tick when creating the debate which says that any forfeit results in an automatic win to the other team. Better to tick that option than just state it in the rules.
Posted 2014-02-11 20:33:16
The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

2014-03-14 23:05:37
adminJudge: admin    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: Username
Reasoning:
My apologies to both debaters for accidentally ticking the wrong box the first time around. Um, yeah, BOP, first to forfeit and the incredibly exciting filler are the reasons for my decision.
0 comments on this judgement
2014-03-15 04:32:53
nzlockieJudge: nzlockie    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: Username
Reasoning:
Really? I'm going username because judex had burden of proof and was the first to forfeit.

Feedback:
Exciting! Now its a tie! This is more exciting than the actual debate!
1 user rated this judgement as exceptional
1 user rated this judgement as constructive
0 comments on this judgement
2014-03-17 19:06:42
TheCPJudge: TheCP
Win awarded to: Username
Reasoning:
judex forfeited their first round, not only did they forfeit but they also took on the burden of proof. This allowed CON to not have to submit an argument either way as PRO failed to affirm anything at all. Easy win.
1 user rated this judgement as exceptional
1 user rated this judgement as constructive
0 comments on this judgement
2014-03-17 22:10:14
DTinfinityJudge: DTinfinity
Win awarded to: Username
Reasoning:
Though neither side made an argument, the BoP was on pro, so he is more heavily affected by forfeiting. CON wins this debate because pro simpily failed to affirm his BoP, and con had less forfeits. Easy win for the con side.
1 user rated this judgement as constructive
0 comments on this judgement
2014-03-17 23:23:28
RomaniiiJudge: Romaniii
Win awarded to: Username
Reasoning:
Full FF, and the filler was great.
1 user rated this judgement as exceptional
0 comments on this judgement
2014-03-17 23:25:58
JonbonbonJudge: Jonbonbon
Win awarded to: Username
Reasoning:
What TheCP said.

Feedback:
Don't forfeit.
1 user rated this judgement as good
1 user rated this judgement as constructive
0 comments on this judgement
2014-03-18 21:46:03
ADreamOfLibertyJudge: ADreamOfLiberty
Win awarded to: Username
2014-03-19 16:40:12
Krazzy_PlayerJudge: Krazzy_Player
Win awarded to: Username
Reasoning:
Username at-least typed one round.
1 user rated this judgement as good
1 user rated this judgement as exceptional
0 comments on this judgement
2014-03-22 19:11:17
JustAnotherGuyJudge: JustAnotherGuy
Win awarded to: Username
2014-03-23 22:01:05
PinkieJudge: Pinkie    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: Username
Reasoning:
I voted con due to ff first by pro.
1 user rated this judgement as good
1 user rated this judgement as exceptional
0 comments on this judgement

Rules of the debate

  • Text debate
  • Individual debate
  • 3 rounds
  • 8000 characters per round
  • Reply speeches
  • Uses cross-examination
  • Community Judging Standard (notes)
  • Forfeiting rounds does not mean forfeiting the debate
  • Images allowed
  • No HTML formatting
  • Rated debate
  • Time to post: 3 days
  • Time to vote: 2 weeks
  • Time to prepare: None
Don't forfeit any round