Rate this heading font

Everyone - I'm going to be trialing some heading fonts. Said I'd do this a couple of months ago and never got around to it lol. Take a look at a heading and tell me what you think!

Note: you may need to refresh the page to see it

admin: It looks better, but the size has always been my main concern. I don't like large + clunky headers, especially on debates.

Blackflag: That's mostly because you like ridiculously long debate motions though.

admin: Regardless, it looks ugly even in two words. I prefer small and neat, to large and clunky.

admin: The font itself is superior though. I would go with something like arial or georgia.

Blackflag: Well - isn't being large the whole point of a heading? Large and bold have kind of always been what set headings apart.

admin: It is twice the size that it should be. Probably 8 times larger than the text under the header.

Blackflag: It's currently roughly 2.2 times the size of the text under the header, not 8 times the size. Halving the size would make it almost exactly the same size as the regular text.

admin: I prefer Sans-serif fonts.

admin: To clarify that though - if you exclude line height from text size an argument could be made that it's actually 3 times in real terms as opposed to 2.2. But it's still not anywhere close to 8 times.

nzlockie: I do intend to trial one.

admin: I like this one.

it takes some getting used to.

New heading font. Refresh the page everybody!!!

A little tacky

Blackflag: Man, just after you were pressuring me with wanting something lighter etc.

admin: Smaller, simpler, and in bold. What about font 16 normal text?

Blackflag: So do you want bold or normal lol?

Let's give this font a fair chance - I'll get a little bit more feedback on it first.

admin: Just want to bump this thread in case people wonder why headings look funny now