EDEB8 - Ultimate Online Debating
About Us   Debate    Judge   Forum
Views:
723

Homosexuality is bad for society.

(PRO)
0 points
(CON)
WINNER!
3 points
GekkGekk (CON)
Homosexuality has helped to make our society better and added to the economy.

In America, we have an overpopulation issue as well as many unwanted or accidental pregnancies.
Homosexuality has helped reduce this number.

Homosexuality being bad for society and corrupting adults is complete conjecture.

Return To Top | Posted:
2021-01-08 08:44:01
| Speak Round
David NicholsDavid Nichols (PRO)
1.Of course Sodomites can help the economy when they're at work, but then they get off work and poison society in the ways I delineated. 2.There is no overpopulation of Whites. Whites are decreasing and need to reproduce more. Perhaps you are referring to Africa and China. 3.Trading the sickness of homosexuality for abortion just trades one problem for another. 4.Homosexual corruption is real. They have asked me if I wanted anal or oral sex.
Return To Top | Posted:
2021-01-08 09:18:36
| Speak Round
GekkGekk (CON)
Please explain how society is being poisoned?
So far you have done nothing to show that homosexuality is bad for society.
If anything homosexuality has shown us the worst offenders in society including the bigots and supremacists.

Regarding overpopulation of white people how do you define that? Is that just people with European ancestry or just people who happen to be white. Why do people need to be white? Do you feel white people are superior to people that happen to have other skin pigments?

Your 3rd argument literally means nothing. It's not trading one problem for another because homosexuality is not a sickness. That may be your opinion but it is not reflected in reality.

You had a person proposition you for sex and you call it corruption? Has a man never propositioned a woman for sex or vice versa?
This literally means nothing, are you frightened that males who are homosexual will treat other males in the same derogatory manner many men still treat women today?

Return To Top | Posted:
2021-01-08 09:51:08
| Speak Round
David NicholsDavid Nichols (PRO)
1.AGAIN, Homosexuals poison by corrupting, disgusting, and confusing. 2.Bigotry (intolerance) against bad things is good. 3."White supremacy" doesn't exist. Whites don't even like thinking about problem people. 4.White=European 5.People need to be White so the race continues. Stupid question. 6.Color is irrelevant. Only behavior matters. 7.Homosexuality IS a sickness. If people were normally that way, life would never have existed.
8.Propositioning normal behavior is not corruption. Another stupid question. 9.Sodomite males can't treat normal males badly. They'll find their teeth on the floor. Another stupid question.

Return To Top | Posted:
2021-01-08 10:27:39
| Speak Round
GekkGekk (CON)
Your arguments hold no water.
It is clear that you have no objective evidence to support your claims and simply
misguided opinions fulled by ignorance.
You have shown no statistical evidence for why homosexuality is bad for society and
have only served to look foolish in this debate platform.
Perhaps my words are harsh however it appears you support bigotry are completely ok with Nazi ideals.
This morally weak position shows your brainwashed viewpoint.

I am not sure where to go from here but I think the debate is pretty clear.

Return To Top | Posted:
2021-01-08 11:45:48
| Speak Round


View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment
David NicholsDavid Nichols
1.You want statistics? Statistics aren't kept on how many people are solicited by homosexuals and offended by their deranged public behavior. 2.Bigotry (intolerance) against insane behavior (homosexuality) is good. 3.Nazis try to protect their countries from strange foreigners and sexual deviants, like LGBTs. That's wonderful. I'm happy whenever they "put more away".
Posted 2021-01-11 17:51:55
The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

2021-01-09 19:36:19
jeremywarcherJudge: jeremywarcher
Win awarded to: Gekk
Reasoning:
David Nichols makes several assertions in his opening statement.
One, that homosexuals attempt to corrupt normal adults. David makes no attempt to define a "normal adult" nor does he explain what specifically homosexuals are doing to corrupt these "normal adults". No evidence is given for this allegedly corrupting effect that he claims homosexuals to have on others.

Two, that homosexuals act disgusting in public. Again, David does not explain in specific detail what disgusting way homosexuals are acting. In what way do homosexuals act that is worse than their heterosexual counterparts?

Three, that homosexuals confuse children. Yet again, how?

David begins on vague and poorly defended claims. Rather than explain his claims in debate, David insists on repeating them, as if repetition will make them suddenly rational.

The debate goes to a weird racial place in the middle.

It is hard not to vote for ZZBrandon here as he was the only one in the debate who was attempting to debate.



Feedback:
David Nichols. If you are going to attack a whole group, make sure you bring a much sharper sword.
1 user rated this judgement as constructive
0 comments on this judgement

Rules of the debate

  • Text debate
  • Individual debate
  • 3 rounds
  • 1000 characters per round
  • No reply speeches
  • No cross-examination
  • Permissive Judging Standard (notes)
  • Forfeiting rounds means forfeiting the debate
  • Images allowed
  • HTML formatting allowed
  • Rated debate
  • Time to post: 3 days
  • Time to vote: 3 days
  • Time to prepare: None