__________________

In this, we can talk about anything. We can do discussions in this thread without going off topic.
I want to see how this works out.
The title is whatever you want it to be.
Just don't post anything violating the terms of use.

Trying double tagging:
My Hands Are Yuge

Bi0Hazard: Great, it worked.

Was the Treaty of Versailles too harsh?

Famousdebater: Is it more harsh than the war?
If so, then I would say yes.

Bi0Hazard: Well it basically stated that Germany had the sole blame for WW1 and some argue that this made Germans angry and boosted Hitler's campaign causing the rise of Hitler. Though some say that it's for other reasons.

Famousdebater: I should probably clarify by stating that the article blaming Germany for WW1 was article 231, so this wasn't the only thing the treaty said.

Famousdebater: Well it basically stated that Germany had the sole blame for WW1 and some argue that this made Germans angry and boosted Hitler's campaign causing the rise of Hitler.
If that is true, then I would say it was too harsh for the Germans to take.

@Famousdebater
What is your reasoning on banning firearms?

Bi0Hazard: What is your reasoning on banning firearms?

Mainly the murder rate. There are graphs and accurate statistical data in regards to the murder rates (as well as the percentages of these murders being committed using firearms). And the countries with complete bans on guns have a significantly lower murder rate and there being virtually no deaths by guns. Also, in the same period of time that 150 school shootings have been committed in the US, only 1 school shooting has occurred in the UK (and nobody died in this one). If you think about the number of people that have died as a result of guns laws in the US compared to if there was a gun ban, and if you then think about the number of children that died as a result of gun laws in the US it becomes incredibly clear that guns are working as a net detriment to the US - and these are just two of the arguments that I use against guns (there's also accidents, suicides, prevention of disruption of gun culture, etc.).

Famousdebater: Do you personally dislike guns as well?

Bi0Hazard: What do you mean? My opinion on guns is that they should be banned from citizens because we cannot trust citizens to act with consideration to the law. I believe that people are bad, not guns. With that said, those bad people cannot commit those wrong acts if guns are not legal, so whilst I do not personally dislike guns I think that a gun ban is needed in order to stop bad people (which I do dislike).

Famousdebater: What I mean is that, are you interested in guns?
Do you like them or dislike them?

I know it is different where I live, but there are people that like weapons and have a passion in guns and there are people too afraid to touch a gun.

You don't have to have a gun to like them, many kids get their dose through their video games.

Bi0Hazard: I'm pretty neutral in terms of that then. I don't particularly like or dislike them.

Famousdebater: If you heard gun shots from a distance outside, what would your reaction be?

Bi0Hazard: As a kid I lived near a police firing range. Sometimes we'd go walking quite close to there and I'd always be super, super scared whenever I heard a gun. I imagine my reaction as an adult would be even worse.

Bi0Hazard: I'd be concerned since I live in scoundrel where guns are banned and I don't live near any hunters so it would almost certainly be a criminal.

Famousdebater: Sorry that autocorrected to scoundrel. It's supposed to say 'an area' not scoundrel.

Famousdebater: Where I live, you hear gun shots out in the distance and its the norm. Hunters and just recreational shooters.
Now, if its in the city, then its police or criminals.

admin: You are one of those people too afraid to even touch a gun?
Fear of guns?